Processing math: 100%

Tuesday, September 22, 2015

Simplify 2(x8+y8+z8)(x4+y4+z4)2 (First Attempt)

Simplify 2(x8+y8+z8)(x4+y4+z4)2.

Please don't be tempted by the temptation to expand the second term as it will lead to headache and no closer to the answer of the more simplified form:

Tuesday, September 15, 2015

Prove 1000!11000>999!1999.

Prove 1000!11000>999!1999.

This inequality would be easy to prove if one uses the more advance knowledge, like Stirling's formula where it states when n then we have n!nnen2πn.

But, elementary method works well too in this problem.

Monday, September 14, 2015

Hard Inequality Problem

Let x,y,z be real numbers such that 6x+2y+3z=12+xyz.

Prove that (x2+1)(y2+9)(z2+4)144.

Note that

(x2+1)(y2+9)(z2+4)(6x+2y+3zxyz)2

Friday, September 11, 2015

Prove that: ⌊√(n)+√(n+1)⌋=⌊√(4n+2)⌋, for all positive integer n.

Prove that: n+n+1=4n+2, for all nN.

My solution:

Step 1:

Note that:

4n2+4n<4n2+4n+1<4n2+8n+4

Tuesday, September 8, 2015

Prove that: n+1/(n+(n+2))=n, for all nN.

Prove that: n+1n+n+2=n, for all nN.

My solution:

Step 1:

First, note that the expression inside the floor function on the left can be rewritten such that we have:

Saturday, September 5, 2015

Without the help of calculator, evaluate 810828567056280801.

Without the help of calculator, evaluate 810828567056280801.

This might look like there will be a lot of guessing before getting the right answer. But, if you toy around with the figure 10828567056280801, it's not hard to see we could rewrite it so that we have:

10828567056280801

Thursday, September 3, 2015

Prove 2+3>π

Prove 2+3>π.

Note that we could use the previously established result from the famous people or even our own finding to construct for the future conjectures and hence argument to help us in determining the plot that we are going to use to solve the new problem at hand, that is one of the very good traits of highly proficient problem solver.

Wednesday, September 2, 2015

Classic proof: 227>π

Prove 227>π.

There is a very classic and elegant proof for this inequality involving π and its fraction representative 227.

It's using the graphical and integration method to prove 227>π.

Tuesday, September 1, 2015

Develep the power of observation

If you're given the two graphs that are plotted in the same Cartesian plane below, what do you notice?